
Kirk: "I'll kill you."
Kirk: "Can half a man live?"
And it's the sci-fi/fantasy show staple: the evil double.
When I first started reviewing this episode, I couldn't stop writing about its flaws. The use of the transporter to either screw things up -- or fix things -- was overdone in Star Trek, and made no scientific sense whatsoever. (I remember a Mad magazine parody showing Kirk materializing with his foot sticking out of his head.) The dog had a horn that kept moving around, and where did the dog come from? The planet where the temperature goes down a couple of hundred degrees below zero every night? And (here's the big one) how much sense did it make that a huge starship with a large crew wouldn't have a backup to the transporter, like the shuttlecrafts that show up later in the series?
But Star Trek is not a documentary. It's a science fiction show created in the 1960s with an extremely low budget, and when television special effects was in its infancy. I've always thought that "The Enemy Within" was an exceptional episode, for one specific reason: how the division of self was handled.
Kirk wasn't just divided into "good" and "evil"; Kirk-positive was gentle, compassionate and courageous, but also indecisive, forgetful and apathetic, a pale reflection of his usual dynamic self. Kirk-negative was passionate, violent, willful, childish, a liar and a potential rapist -- but when he walked onto the bridge, he took command without hesitation. (I'm tempted to say that overacting is a negative characteristic, too.)
I'm not a fan of William Shatner's, but I have to give him credit for this performance because he just went for it. Kirk-positive and Kirk-negative were as different as he could possibly make them with his voice, expression, and body language (with the assistance of eyeliner, perspiration, and camera angles). I've always particularly liked the way the Kirk-positive held Kirk-negative in his arms, literally and symbolically embracing and acknowledging the worst in himself.
Spock, a divided being himself, was so fascinated with the changes going on in Kirk that he was actually rude -- gleefully analyzing what went into making Kirk an exceptional leader, and what each half was lacking. Kirk-positive didn't seem offended, and leaned pretty hard on Spock. Actually, he should have turned command over to Spock as soon as they knew what had happened. But that would have taken the drama out of the double Kirk confrontation on the bridge, and we couldn't have that.
Ben says...
First thought, BEST ALIEN DOG EVER! Seriously, that daggit on Battlestar classic is so lame in comparison, and don't get me started on Archer's beagle. Smallville’s Krypto the Superdog would obviously be a frontrunner, but renaming him Shelby? Really? Shelby?!? Sorry, I have to get back to Star Trek.
Second thought, this episode is like Nietzsche with Orange Dogs (okay, I got to get over that dog, how about: Freud with Transporter Accidents). This may be one of the single most influential episodes of the whole series. Seriously, this is a moral lesson of the first order about the violence inherent in us and the importance of harnessing it. While this is certainly a common theme in a lot of modernist thought, I suspect that a whole generation of us took more away from this one hour of TV than from all of our college reading in philosophy, psychology and history combined. In fact, it's so common a theme that I think that it colors all our views of politicians. If a politician can lead and make things happen they are probably evil, but if they give half a damn about people they are dishwater weak incompetents. Could we maybe run Dennis Kucinich and Dick Cheney through the transporter together, Denick Kuciney for President!
Back to Billie for bits and pieces:
-- Star date 1672.1. Specimen-gathering on Alpha 177.
-- Couldn't they have beamed down a shelter of sorts? Environmental suits? Lots and lots of blankets? Something to burn and several packs of matches? And seriously, what about hot coffee? Yes, heaters came down duplicated and broken, but wouldn't hot coffee still be drinkable, plus there'd be twice as much of it?
-- There were some nice bits suggesting mirroring. When Kirk-positive first materialized, he turned the wrong way when he tried to leave the transporter room. Kirk-negative materialized facing backward, which also nicely symbolized what he was.
-- Kirk-negative went to Sick Bay to pick up a bottle of Saurian brandy before attacking Janice Rand in her quarters. Why Sick Bay? Does Bones like a nip now and then? Is it medicinal? The bottle certainly had an unusual shape, too. Somewhat phallic, wouldn't you say?
-- It's only the fifth episode, and Janice Rand was assaulted a second time. I think I'd take the hint, transfer out, and take my basket weave hair with me. I also thought Spock telling Janice that the "imposter" had some interesting characteristics was sort of mean, like, don't you wish he'd actually raped you?
-- This was the second time in a row that the restraints in Sick Bay were used. They were probably still warm from Sulu.
-- The suede phaser gunbelts were cool-looking. It's a shame they stopped wearing them.
-- Geological technician Fisher's job title was such a mouthful that he couldn't get it out quickly enough while trying to summon help.
-- This episode was written by sci-fi master Richard Matheson.
Quotes:
Sulu: "Do you think you might be able to find a long rope somewhere and lower us down a pot of hot coffee?"
Kirk-positive: "I'll see what we can do."
Sulu: "Rice wine will do if you're short on coffee."
McCoy: (about the dog) "He's dead, Jim."
Even with its flaws, this is a powerful and popular episode. Four out of four pots of hot coffee,
Billie
All of our Star Trek reviews are archived here.
Original air date: October 6, 1966
Season 1, episode 5
... Read full post











